Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:27:10 10/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2004 at 07:07:06, martin fierz wrote: >On October 04, 2004 at 16:51:50, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >unfortunately this is not a fantastic test position - white appears to be in >serious trouble, i.e. if he doesn't do something drastic like e5 and Rxf7 he >will simply lose. > >you can see that all posts which say "my engine finds it" are showing clear >negative scores for white. The target in games is to find the best moves and not to find the theoretic result. programs that understand that e5 is better for white relative to the alternatives have something positive. Note only that singular extensions are not needed and better evaluation may be enough to find 43.e5 Latest Movei does not find 43.e5 in a few minutes inspite of the fact that Bxb4 fails low again and again. Hopefully it can find it at depth 15 after searching to depth 15 but more than 10 minutes in a fast hardware(A3000) is not something that I can define as a reasonable time depth=15 -3.20 a3b4 b3d4 d1e1 a1b2 e3c2 d4c2 b1c2 b8b4 g1h1 b4c4 c2d1 a4a3 f3b3 b2f6 d1f3 f6h4 h1g1 Nodes: 266152577 NPS: 533126 Time: 00:08:19.23 Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.