Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Leko vs Kramnik (7) 1/2 (nun 3.5-3.5) PGN

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 10:22:59 10/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 05, 2004 at 12:43:05, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 05, 2004 at 12:26:57, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>Game 7 and all other games are ready for
>>download on my website
>>http://www.utzingerk.com/news.htm
>>Leko today missed to keep its advantage
>>after the opening. What a pity: such games
>>should not end with a draw.
>>Kurt
>>
>>Die 7. Partie bzw. alle Partien stehen zum
>>Download bereit auf meiner Website
>>http://www.utzingerk.com/news.htm
>>Heute hat Leko viel zu zahm agiert und
>>es verpasst, seinen Eröffnungsvorteil
>>auszunutzen.
>>Mfg
>>Kurt
>
>I do not know if Leko could get the advantage but the annotation by GM
>Jonathan Rowson is nonsense.
>
>He suggests 17.Qe4 Bd6 18.Rfd1 Re8?? 19.Nxf7??
>
>18...Re8 is a tactical mistake because of 19.Qd5 that wins the bishop(Re6 does
>not help because of Bc5 and trying to capture the white knight will lead to
>mate)
>
>19.Nxf7 is another tactical mistake.
>Are GM's really so weak in tactics that they cannot see it or maybe they simply
>do not care about the quality of their analysis and let themselves suggest the
>first line that they think about when in a real game they will never do it?
>
>Uri

      I am always wondering why GM's do comment live games
      in a very conservative, meaningless way and sometimes
      - as stated in your example - even completely wrong.
      Kurt




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.