Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 01:22:23 10/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2004 at 13:22:59, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On October 05, 2004 at 12:43:05, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 05, 2004 at 12:26:57, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Game 7 and all other games are ready for >>>download on my website >>>http://www.utzingerk.com/news.htm >>>Leko today missed to keep its advantage >>>after the opening. What a pity: such games >>>should not end with a draw. >>>Kurt >>> >>>Die 7. Partie bzw. alle Partien stehen zum >>>Download bereit auf meiner Website >>>http://www.utzingerk.com/news.htm >>>Heute hat Leko viel zu zahm agiert und >>>es verpasst, seinen Eröffnungsvorteil >>>auszunutzen. >>>Mfg >>>Kurt >> >>I do not know if Leko could get the advantage but the annotation by GM >>Jonathan Rowson is nonsense. >> >>He suggests 17.Qe4 Bd6 18.Rfd1 Re8?? 19.Nxf7?? >> >>18...Re8 is a tactical mistake because of 19.Qd5 that wins the bishop(Re6 does >>not help because of Bc5 and trying to capture the white knight will lead to >>mate) >> >>19.Nxf7 is another tactical mistake. >>Are GM's really so weak in tactics that they cannot see it or maybe they simply >>do not care about the quality of their analysis and let themselves suggest the >>first line that they think about when in a real game they will never do it? >> >>Uri > > I am always wondering why GM's do comment live games > in a very conservative, meaningless way and sometimes > - as stated in your example - even completely wrong. > Kurt Because they don't understand what is going on. They are simply too weak compared to the players. Gábor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.