Author: Tony Werten
Date: 03:38:28 10/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2004 at 05:19:27, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 05, 2004 at 18:41:58, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >>On October 04, 2004 at 20:23:27, Don Beal wrote: >> >>>Hmmm. It's very helpful to post the actual code. >>>My time is limited though. >> >>No problem -- you've made good comments and de-lurked >>and everyone enjoys that. >> >>The bet was to decrease the WAC #141 problem down to <= 10 >>seconds without turning off the null move as one >>claimant had done. >> >>Although I am now at 49 seconds for WAC 141 solution with >>null move enabled and not limited compared to the earlier 95 >>seconds, the <= 10 bet is still open. I'll hereby double the >>bet to $100 to the first person who helps me achieve it directly. > >If you use mate threat extension(and if I understand correctly you use it) then >I suggest to limit it to the case when >the following conditions happens: >1)There is no another extension for the last 2 plies. >2)The side that threats the mate has not a big advantage of more than 2 pawns >and it means that the evaluation is better than 2 pawns against the side to >move. 3) You do not have winning capture on the piece that delivers the checkmate. Tony > >I hope it can help you. > >I believe that >these ideas also should be productive for real games. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.