Author: John Merlino
Date: 14:48:31 10/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2004 at 17:33:01, Graham Banks wrote: >On October 06, 2004 at 17:20:01, John Merlino wrote: > >>On October 06, 2004 at 14:47:16, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On October 06, 2004 at 14:40:40, axel binevskiy wrote: >>> >>>>I mean all these complains that were posted. >>> >>> >>>I think you'll find that those who complained with aspects of CM10th Edition >>>would have been happier all round with CM9000. The latest default version of The >>>King engine in CM10th Edition is stronger and better balanced in its playing >>>style than the default engine in CM9000, but as you can see from tournaments >>>being run, modified CM9000 settings can produce really good results also. >>>Apart from the new version of The King engine, I much prefer CM9000 especially >>>as you're able to autorun tournaments. With CM10th Edition you have to manually >>>start each game in a tournament. >>> >>>Graham. >> >>That last item is a horrible oversight (or an even more horrible intentional >>change to the tournament engine). I cannot explain the reasoning behind it being >>that way at all. >> >>There was one other bad bug/oversight/interface decision in the demo that I >>don't know if it still exists in the full version. In the online portion, you >>can only set up games such that you play White or Black -- there is no "random >>color" option. That's just wrong.... >> >>jm > > >Not sure about the online thing as I've never bothered with it. >Hopefully they'll fix the autorun tournament problem in a patch. > >Graham. Would it be too much trouble to give it a try? I'm very curious, since I notified the Project Manager of this problem as soon as I saw it in the demo (which was before the final version was released). jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.