Author: Alessandro Scotti
Date: 14:53:33 10/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2004 at 15:42:02, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >On October 05, 2004 at 18:09:43, Alessandro Scotti wrote: > >>On October 05, 2004 at 16:43:38, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >> >>>What, if best move after null is the reverse previous move, >>>like doing three alternated null moves in a row. >>>What can we conclude then? >> >>Shouldn't be an opponent move between the first move and the null move? If so, >>it's not like three null moves in a row. > >No, the first move by white the nullmove by black and the reverse move by white >(or vice versa). Black to move. > >Same position as the previous tried nullmove by white. Oh... ok. I counted two null moves in your example (one by black and two "anti-moves" by white) but at any rate I see the point now... what about adding a few lines of code to the engine to detect this and see what happens at the end of the sequence?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.