Author: George Sobala
Date: 00:27:12 10/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2004 at 03:06:12, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On October 07, 2004 at 02:27:56, George Sobala wrote: > >>First result: I let Ruffian 2.0.0 (Shredder's nemesis) run the gauntlet >>overnight against Shredder 8 UCI and Shredder Classic 1.1 at 3'+0" blitz. >>Ruffian used its own book, 64M hash, Centrino 1.6GHz, both Shredders used the >>downloadable big book from shredderchess.com. I used the Classic GUI. >> >>Results: >> >>Ruffian v Shredder 8 : 16.5 - 13.5 >>Ruffian v Classic 1.1 : 14.5 - 15.5 >> >>Interesting. > > Not interesting in so far as results > are within the usual statistical error > margins. Much too less games played > to conclude something. > Kurt That is statistical nihilism and is simply not true. I can statistically conclude the following: 1. Shredder 8 is not HUGELY better than Classic 1.1 against Ruffian2 at 3+0 blitz. 2. There is more than a 50% chance that Classic 1.1 is STRONGER than Ruffian2 at 3+0 blitz. ... which I find interesting. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.