Author: Michael Henderson
Date: 11:49:29 10/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2004 at 18:41:58, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On October 04, 2004 at 20:23:27, Don Beal wrote: > >>Hmmm. It's very helpful to post the actual code. >>My time is limited though. > >No problem -- you've made good comments and de-lurked >and everyone enjoys that. > >The bet was to decrease the WAC #141 problem down to <= 10 >seconds without turning off the null move as one >claimant had done. > >Although I am now at 49 seconds for WAC 141 solution with >null move enabled and not limited compared to the earlier 95 >seconds, the <= 10 bet is still open. I'll hereby double the >bet to $100 to the first person who helps me achieve it directly. Hi Stuart, How do you handle mate scores (probe/store) in the hash table? That is a tricky concept sometimes and can lead to bugs :) Also, if you use "bounded" mate scores in the hash table your scores will not be exact. Exact mate scores are necessary for the mate threat detection. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.