Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 00:18:29 10/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2004 at 18:04:39, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On October 05, 2004 at 01:50:19, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On October 04, 2004 at 18:31:53, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >> >>>On October 03, 2004 at 09:02:49, GuyHaworth wrote: >>> >>>>LCC TWIC thinks: >>>> >>>> - 64. Bh4 would not have saved the game >>> >>>Can you give a variation how to win after 64...Bh4? >>> >>> 8/6k1/2R3p1/4Kp1p/5P1b/5P1P/8/8 w - - 1 65 >> >>What if White arranges to get his King on e6 and Rook on the eighth with Black >>to move? At first blush, it looks like a zugzwang to me. > >Thanks Ricardo, I got it now. Also thanks to GCP for a concrete variation. Going >from back to front, I get now after 62...Bg3: > > >8/2R5/5kp1/3K1p1p/5P2/5PbP/8/8 w - - > >16/05 0:00 +4.55 63.Rc6+ Ke7 64.Ke5 Kf7 (486) 3 > >16/33 0:07 +4.55 63.Rc6+ Ke7 64.Ke5 Kf7 (1.035.455) 142 > >17/33 0:07 +4.55 63.Rc6+ Ke7 64.Ke5 Kf7 (1.035.456) 142 > > >and 62...Be1 is suggested instead of Bg3 with a "no progress line" in the PV. Yes, 62...Be1 is a stone cold draw. > >Regards, >Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.