Author: Graham Banks
Date: 11:54:05 10/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2004 at 10:02:59, Milorad Madjar wrote: >On October 09, 2004 at 04:41:13, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On October 09, 2004 at 03:24:43, Milorad Madjar wrote: >> >>>On October 09, 2004 at 01:34:43, Wilhelm Hudetz wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Milan, >>>> >>>>great Blitz-setting, defeted my CM at 5+0 in a quick test 8 - 2. >>>>Now I look what it do at 10+5. >>>> >>>>later >>>>Wilhelm >>> >>>Hi Wilhelm, >>> yes it settings play good in blitz match, in the future I will play against >>>D.Fritz 8 on long time control. >>> >>>Regards >>>Milan >> >> >>Hi Milan, >> >>I'll be interested to see whether or not selectivity 10 will suffice for longer >>time controls. I seem to recall that Johan himself suggested perhaps the >>selectivity should be higher if people were going to try longer time controls on >>fast computers. >> >>Regards, Graham. > >Hi Graham, >I think that The King 3.33 has the problem with tactics and higher selectivity >is not good for him, specially of the end games , but I'm traied with >selectivity 11,12,13,14, ..., and I'm recived interesanting result with >selectivity 14. > >Regards >Milan Yes - selectivity 14 would be what I would try. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.