Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Wac or Wacnew?

Author: Pallav Nawani

Date: 11:50:21 10/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 11, 2004 at 18:50:15, Stuart Cracraft wrote:

>On October 11, 2004 at 14:55:14, Pallav Nawani wrote:
>
>>
>>I was testing new version of my engine on WAC and I got a surprise:
>>Natwarlal scores 263/300 in 1 second searches and 253/300 in 10 second searches!
>>I am using 1.4Ghz athlon.
>
>Hi -- not related specifically to your post but your code appears to be
>comparable. Would you consider simultaneous code exchange of Natwarlal
>for my GA?
>

Hi,

Natwarlal is open source. Engine + code available here:
http://www.ironcode.com/natwarlal.html
Code for the latest version (0.08) is not uploaded yet (code of 0.07 is
available), but I will put it up in due time.

Pallav



>>
>>I have read on ICC people talking about WAC busts. Are there any wrong solutions
>>in the WAC test suite? Should I switch to WACnew (assuming that it is a
>>corrected version of WAC)?
>>
>
>I switched to WACnew and am glad I did so. A few more solutions and my
>score went up some!
>
>Stuart



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.