Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Wac or Wacnew?

Author: Stuart Cracraft

Date: 20:16:03 10/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 12, 2004 at 14:50:21, Pallav Nawani wrote:

>On October 11, 2004 at 18:50:15, Stuart Cracraft wrote:
>
>>On October 11, 2004 at 14:55:14, Pallav Nawani wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I was testing new version of my engine on WAC and I got a surprise:
>>>Natwarlal scores 263/300 in 1 second searches and 253/300 in 10 second searches!
>>>I am using 1.4Ghz athlon.
>>
>>Hi -- not related specifically to your post but your code appears to be
>>comparable. Would you consider simultaneous code exchange of Natwarlal
>>for my GA?
>>
>
>Hi,
>
>Natwarlal is open source. Engine + code available here:
>http://www.ironcode.com/natwarlal.html
>Code for the latest version (0.08) is not uploaded yet (code of 0.07 is
>available), but I will put it up in due time.
>

No rush -- I took the last one. I find your code easy to read.
My main enjoyment is with the reductions and the Botvinnik-Markoff
extension and hope to profit from them.

Other than that I see nothing in my program that you might not already
have except SEE. My SEE was developed by people on this board.

Stuart



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.