Author: David Dahlem
Date: 05:31:07 10/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2004 at 07:42:24, Ingo Bauer wrote: >On October 13, 2004 at 06:06:52, emerson tan wrote: > >>Since computers can play much better than humans, the next team humans versus >>team computers, computers should not use opening books. >> >>Fischer mentioned before that he plays against computers with opening book >>disabled cause the opening book is made by man. >> >>Its also interesting to see how the computer navigate the opening using purely >>engine. It is also interesting to see humans play against the computers which >>does not play book and we will have an unfamiliar position in less than 10 >>moves. >> >>Get rid of the tablebases also. The ability to tire on human part and the >>ability to blunder is already a big disadvantage to humans. > > >I completly agree and want to make an extension to that proposal: All humans >should be lobotomized to lose the knowledge about opening they did not invent. >Then we would have a equal match! > >Bye >Ingo Human have to think during openings, they don't look up moves in a list. If computers created their own opening book completely by their own learning, then we would have an equal match. :-) Regards Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.