Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 05:40:57 10/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 13, 2004 at 08:31:07, David Dahlem wrote: >On October 13, 2004 at 07:42:24, Ingo Bauer wrote: > >>On October 13, 2004 at 06:06:52, emerson tan wrote: >> >>>Since computers can play much better than humans, the next team humans versus >>>team computers, computers should not use opening books. >>> >>>Fischer mentioned before that he plays against computers with opening book >>>disabled cause the opening book is made by man. >>> >>>Its also interesting to see how the computer navigate the opening using purely >>>engine. It is also interesting to see humans play against the computers which >>>does not play book and we will have an unfamiliar position in less than 10 >>>moves. >>> >>>Get rid of the tablebases also. The ability to tire on human part and the >>>ability to blunder is already a big disadvantage to humans. >> >> >>I completly agree and want to make an extension to that proposal: All humans >>should be lobotomized to lose the knowledge about opening they did not invent. >>Then we would have a equal match! >> >>Bye >>Ingo > >Human have to think during openings, they don't look up moves in a list. If >computers created their own opening book completely by their own learning, then >we would have an equal match. :-) So we must forbit human GM's and generally all chess players to read chess books. They should not have the right according to this logic, to learn something that they have not created with their own learning........ > >Regards >Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.