Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 21:53:40 10/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2004 at 05:50:32, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 12, 2004 at 00:55:06, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: > >>I would never consider Kasparov , Kramnik as the best Anticomputer players (No >>doubt they are in the top 3 players in the world right now but they are not Anti >>Computer Chess Experts. >> >>The best Anticomputer player is the one who gets the silicon monster to play the >>positions in which its evaluations are not realistic and where it feels >>uncomfortable. The one who gets the computers to play such positions most often >>can be considered as Anti-computer expert. Rarely do we find Humans outplaying >>Computers in Tactics so Depth is not a biggest factor here. > > >The main advantage from bigger depth is better positional moves and not tactics. >Tell computers to change their mind only if they find something that is at least >0.5 pawn better than the move they suggest at depth 1 and I believe they will >not be even at master level. > >Uri Is that so? and doesn't evaluation play a major role here? Regards Vikrant
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.