Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: world's biggest anti-computer chess expert. ?

Author: Vikrant Malvankar

Date: 21:53:40 10/13/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 12, 2004 at 05:50:32, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 12, 2004 at 00:55:06, Vikrant Malvankar wrote:
>
>>I would never consider Kasparov , Kramnik as the best Anticomputer players (No
>>doubt they are in the top 3 players in the world right now but they are not Anti
>>Computer Chess Experts.
>>
>>The best Anticomputer player is the one who gets the silicon monster to play the
>>positions in which its evaluations are not realistic and where it feels
>>uncomfortable. The one who gets the computers to play such positions most often
>>can be considered as Anti-computer expert. Rarely do we find Humans outplaying
>>Computers in Tactics so Depth is not a biggest factor here.
>
>
>The main advantage from bigger depth is better positional moves and not tactics.
>Tell computers to change their mind only if they find something that is at least
>0.5 pawn better than the move they suggest at depth 1 and I believe they will
>not be even at master level.
>
>Uri

Is that so? and doesn't evaluation play a major role here?

Regards

Vikrant



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.