Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is shredder the slowest in terms of NPS?

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 00:09:42 10/14/04

Go up one level in this thread

On October 14, 2004 at 02:39:03, Vikrant Malvankar wrote:

>My AMD Athlon 2000 XP+ processor (over clocking gives approx. 2.02 ghz)
>RAM : 256 MB DDR RAM
>HardDisk : 40 GB mostly unutilised
>engine : Shredder8,Shredder6
>Interface : Shredder classic
>
>I use shredder6 under classic interface which gives me approx. 528 knps on an
>average 128 MB hash
>Shredder8 classic provided in cd under classic interface gives 588 knps. same
>hash
>While Deep Fritz8 under chessbase gives me 1108 knps. 128 MB hash
>DeepJunior7 gives me 1682 knps which is the highest.
>
>why such a big differance or am i making a mistake in settings?

This is normal.

But Hiarcs is even slower :)

--
GCP

• Re: Is shredder the slowest in terms of NPS? Vikrant Malvankar 00:57:02 10/14/04
  • Re: Is shredder the slowest in terms of NPS? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 01:02:24 10/14/04
    • Re: Is shredder the slowest in terms of NPS? Vikrant Malvankar 01:33:24 10/14/04
    • Re: Is shredder the slowest in terms of NPS? Vikrant Malvankar 01:33:23 10/14/04
    • Re: Is shredder the slowest in terms of NPS? Vikrant Malvankar 01:33:23 10/14/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.