Author: stuart taylor
Date: 04:26:23 10/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2004 at 07:11:12, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >On October 14, 2004 at 04:57:10, Daniel Jackson wrote: > >>On October 14, 2004 at 02:06:33, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>It should be stronger than Tiger 14 :-) >>> >>>14 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2719 30 -30 557 61% 2640 >>>14 Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2719 23 -22 983 58% 2659 >>> >>>Jouni >> >>This does NOT mean Tiger 15 is weaker than Tiger 14....you should know >>better...but I guess you don't! > >But this also does not mean it is (lets say) 50 elo points stronger, if it is it >must be 5-10 elo points stronger only. > >What Jouni means that we want substantial improvement in CT16 as compared to >CT14. > >Regards > >Vikrant But in truth, don't we really want a substantial improvement over all the Shredders and Fritzes to date? Or is it REALLY enough to see only a substantial improvement over the Tigers? (if so, why?) S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.