Author: emerson tan
Date: 09:36:56 10/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2004 at 11:38:24, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 14, 2004 at 11:08:01, emerson tan wrote: > >>On October 13, 2004 at 18:49:37, Álvaro Begué wrote: >> >>>On October 13, 2004 at 18:42:47, emerson tan wrote: >>> >>>>Similarities with morphy, fischer and deep blue, all of them quit when they hit >>>>the most dominating position. in the case of deep blue, it was well above the >>>>other <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=computers&v=56">computers</a> at that <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=time&v=56">time</a>. >>> >>>The deep blue comment is just a provocation, isn't it? Anyway, I'll bite: What >>>evidence do you have that Deep Blue was any better than any other <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=computer&v=56">computer</a> at >>>that time? >> >> >>Just base on hsus statement. a 200 mILLION NPS will beat any pentium 200mhz at >>that <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=time&v=56">time</a>. Some pcs may score a win againts it, but 90 plus of the <a href="http://www.ntsearch.com/search.php?q=time&v=56">time</a> deep >>blue will win > > >Simply bring back Deeper Blue and I will match it against Fritz X on a mere >Centrino 1.8 MHz :-) > >Jorge Deep blue will not come back, it has gone the way of morphy and fisher :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.