Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 04:52:41 10/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2004 at 07:20:14, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>On October 16, 2004 at 04:44:03, Michael Koppel wrote:
>
>>On October 16, 2004 at 04:03:18, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>>On October 15, 2004 at 22:15:29, gerold daniels wrote:
>>>
>>>>good afternoon.
>>>>i have played prodeo v ruffian 1.05 using 3 diff.books for prodeo.
>>>>the results are close to the same with ruffian winning 60% of the
>>>>time.has anyone found a book that would gave better results for
>>>>prodeo..been playing 5 min.games.thanks.gerold.
>>>
>>> Hi Gerold
>>> You waste your time I think: Pro Deo does not belong
>>> to the programs which like blitz games. Pro Deo as
>>> the previous Rebel versions is comparatevely much
>>> stronger at longer time controls.
>>> Kurt
>>
>>Where are the proofs? My tests of results do not confirm your statement.
>>
>>Michael
>
> Hi Michael
> Pro Deo 1.0 is on place 9 in your blitz list.
> This and Gerold's results show the same tendency.
> Kurt
>
>1 Shredder8 2774 17 25 870 69.7 % 2629
>2 Hiarcs 9 2732 18 22 884 64.8 % 2625
>3 DFritz 8 2709 18 20 996 62.3 % 2622
>4 Junior 8 2708 19 21 924 62.2 % 2622
>5 CTiger15.0 2689 19 18 934 59.7 % 2621
>6 TheKing3.33 2680 19 19 962 58.7 % 2619
>7 Ruffian210 2670 20 18 976 57.3 % 2619
>8 List 512 2663 19 18 1042 57.8 % 2609
>9 ProDeo1.0 2641 20 17 1022 53.9 % 2614
Hi Michael
I forgot to mention that Pro Deo 1.0 has neverteless
surprised me as your results are based on a great
amount of games (1022). And considering this my
assumption could be incorrect.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.