Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:29:55 10/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2004 at 09:04:48, Ed Schröder wrote:
>On October 17, 2004 at 09:00:30, Ernst Walet wrote:
>
>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e5 6. Ndb5 d6 7. Bg5 a6 8.
>>Na3 b5 9. Bxf6 gxf6 10. Nd5 f5 11. Bd3 Be6 12. O-O Bxd5 13. exd5 Ne7 14. Qh5 e4
>>15. Be2 Bg7 16. c3 O-O 17. Nc2 Qc8 18. Ne3 f4 19. Qg5 fxe3 20. Qxe7 b4 21. fxe3
>>bxc3 22. Rac1 Qe8 23. Qxe8 Rfxe8 24. bxc3 Bh6 25. Kf2 Re5 26. g4 Rxd5 27. Rfd1
>>Rxd1 28. Rxd1 Bf8 29. Rd4 a5 30. Rxe4 Bg7 31. Rc4 Rb8 32. Rc6 Rb2 33. Rc8+ Bf8
>>34. a4 Ra2 35. Kf3 Rxa4 36. Bc4 h6 37. Rc7 Bg7 38. Bxf7+ Kf8 39. Bd5 Be5 40.
>>Rf7+ Ke8 41. Rh7 Ra3 42. Rxh6 Rxc3 43. g5 Rc5 44. Ke4 Rc1 45. Rh7 Rg1 46. Kf5
>>Rf1+ 47. Kg6 *
>
>What's Jeroen's judgement of the position?
>
>Ed
Looks won to me. One question: is this the current Pro Deo, or are there any
modifications in play?
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.