Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What convinces YOU of the strength of a program???

Author: Peter Skinner

Date: 18:38:37 10/17/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 17, 2004 at 20:29:30, stuart taylor wrote:

>According to what you write here, I would feel very supportive of Tiger indeed!
>If it's true that Tiger 15 gets the same rating but with much more fancy play,
>then I really support the idea that Tiger 15 is a worthy upgrade. It ought to be
>stronger than Tiger 14 against humans at any rate, and much more instructive
>too. It would be worth the same thing as about 100-200 elo points in my
>reckoning. Ultimately it would overtake all others, e.g. if speed was increased
>enomously and buggs eliminated....from that and all programs equally.
>My other comments I'll answer in a seperate post.
>S.Taylor

Well CT15 is already out, and does play a more interesting game of chess over
CT14. The new version is labelled CT2004.

I am very confident that it will be stronger than CT15, based on the doubling of
search speed, and the fact Christophe is so thorough with everything he does.

I wrote a review of ChessTiger before, and I thought it was a fantastic product
before, and loved it ever since.

Peter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.