Author: GeoffW
Date: 06:11:54 10/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Richard Thanks for the response >Depends on the type of quiescense search you have: Lean and mean (like Crafty), >or more extensive (like many others). The more precise the score returned from >your quiescense search, the more errors in it will be bothering you (as you will >not have the additional plies of regular search). I think lean, mean and dense would be an accurate description of my qsearch :-) > >This looks wrong to me, even with a small qsearch. I assume you have the eval >score anyway, so better to me looks something like >evalscore+seescore+margin<alpha >Margin is needed to compensate for the changes of the evaluation by performing >the move. >I'm not doing this in the Baron though. Yes looks like it needs a margin adding. The question then is what value is correct? As I mentioned in my other reply, I seem to need a far too large a value from initial experiments. Incidentally, The Baron was one of the 8 test programs I was using for my SEE experiments. Baron was scoring about 70% against my program and beat all the other 7 programs in my Arena gauntlet test tourney. Geoff
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.