Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Enrico is correct ....

Author: Mike Byrne

Date: 20:36:39 10/19/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 19, 2004 at 23:25:34, odell jones wrote:

>On October 19, 2004 at 21:30:56, Mike Byrne wrote:
>
>>On October 19, 2004 at 21:13:52, odell jones wrote:
>>
>>>On October 19, 2004 at 19:55:23, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>>
>>>>How that could be known? And how the question can be made?
>>>>Fisher was just a human being and his genius was of that age.
>>>>You cannot take him out of his time as If to be genius or anything is something
>>>>that exist out of historical circunstances.
>>>>What about Ruy Lopez? Could he beat the monster?
>>>>Lucena?
>>>>Lasker?
>>>>It is the very same preposterous question.
>>>>My best
>>>>fernando
>>>
>>>
>>>  Answer may be unknown, but it is still fun to speculate, atleast i think so.
>>
>>fair enough, but I believe Enrico is correct -- more appropriate in CTF and you
>>will probably get a better response there than here ...
>
>
>
>
>  Are we not talking about A Current Computer Chess program here???????
>Hydra????, I had enough of this bullshit forum . I'll post no more here.

hypothetical fischer discussions get pretty lame, pretty fast ...did you notice
there was no serious responses ??  also, I think you would get more responses in
CTF --  I was just trying to help you out ...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.