Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 00:39:31 10/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2004 at 02:27:19, martin fierz wrote: >so i want to store the move itself in the hashtable instead of the moveindex >now, as probably everybody is doing. Naah. >the question i have is this: should i stick >with two separate tables for QS and main search? or should i just use a single >big table (seems more sensible to me). or should i do no hashing at all in QS? >any opinions on this? One table vs two tables seems like a clear case for one table to me (what would two tables gain, except less efficiency?). To hash or not to hash, that must be *tested*. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.