Author: martin fierz
Date: 01:37:54 10/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2004 at 03:40:28, Richard Pijl wrote: >On October 20, 2004 at 02:27:19, martin fierz wrote: > >>The question i have is this: should i stick >>with two separate tables for QS and main search? or should i just use a single >>big table (seems more sensible to me). or should i do no hashing at all in QS? >>any opinions on this? > >I've experimented with a separate qsearch hash of different sizes, but it didn't >work out for the Baron. A combined hash was better everytime. >In the Baron I'm both storing and retrieving hash entries. I guess it works for >me due to my fat qsearch and slow evaluation function, so it may be different >for you. >Richard. thanks for the answer - i have a rather fat qsearch and a slow eval too, so that is encouraging :-) cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.