Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:28:32 10/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2004 at 07:20:16, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 20, 2004 at 04:44:44, martin fierz wrote: > >>On October 20, 2004 at 03:39:31, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On October 20, 2004 at 02:27:19, martin fierz wrote: >>> >>>>so i want to store the move itself in the hashtable instead of the moveindex >>>>now, as probably everybody is doing. >>> >>>Naah. >> >>naah? i think storing the move itself is much more sensible than the moveindex >>and would have supposed everybody is doing the more sensible thing. at least >>crafty does it that way. you can avoid generating all moves at all times, which >>i have to do now. > >The speedup from doing so was quite uninteresting, last time I calculated it, >something like 1% :) In my case I cannot store an index because the order of my piece list is changed during the search and the result is that the order of generated moves is changed so if I get to the same position again the same index may mean a different move. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.