Author: Jay Urbanski
Date: 12:11:45 10/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2004 at 14:52:46, Albert Silver wrote: >>I don't think so. The general consensus is that it is Gata, and people even >>call him that by name and he responds. Also, Roman gives away himself by his >>temper. I think Roman played a few games before on the DV16 account - he drew >>one and lost one. > >I think the 'general consensus' on the person behind a pseudonym tends have >absolutely no value. Over at PLay chess, I saw a bunch of people get very >excited by the attacking blitz play of GM "Rafael" and the 'general consensus' >was that it was Morozevich or Kasparov. Funny because I thought it was pretty >obvious it was Vaganian, but no one emitting the 'consensus' knew who Vaganian >was. So the consensus was made of people who had zero chess culture. Just my 2 >cents. > > Albert I think it's Kamsky, but it may not be - doesn't matter that much.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.