Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kramnik backs off from reunification?

Author: Sally Weltrop

Date: 04:23:21 10/22/04

Go up one level in this thread


On October 21, 2004 at 19:30:11, Daniel Jackson wrote:

>21.10.2004 According to the Prague Unity Agreement the winners of Kramnik- Leko
>and Kasparov-Kasimzhanov should play for the unified world championhsip title.
>Now Vladimir Kramnik is expressing serious doubts whether this can happen.
>Instead he proposes a fourway tournament (with Kasparov, Anand, Kasimzhanov and
>Ponomariv) to find his opponent in the unification match.
>
>
>Kramnik confirmed that if FIDE would not agree to a dialogue with him and the
>ACP, then the ACP will go its own way. He is ready to discuss conditions under
>which the unification can take place. In principle, his attitude to the idea of
>unification is positive. In Kramnik's opinion the development of chess should be
>seen in relation to corporate sponsors and civilised European countries. If FIDE
>does not like this, he will not work with them. Kramnik does not see prospects
>in the direction which is taken [by FIDE] now.
>
>On the match Kasimdzhanov-Kasparov:"Kasimdzhanov, of course, deserves the match
>with the great player Kasparov. But I do not understand for what reason they
>will play for a world championship". At this point Vasilyev interjected that
>Kramnik had put his signature under the contract that provided for this match.
>Kramnik answered: "Sorry. I put my signature under the Ponomariov-Kasparov
>match. And here were other conditions, which were not fulfilled." As an
>alternative Kramnik proposes to organise, in place of the Kasimdzhanov-Kasparov
>match, a tournament with the participaion of Kasparov, Kasimdzhanov, Anand and
>Ponomariov. The winner would play the unification match against him.
>
>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1969
>
>
>My personal opinion is, Kramnik is making excuses to avoid Kasparov as long as
>possible.
>
>He got this title from Kasparov, and he _owes_ Kasparov a rematch, this is
>really petty!

I totally agree. I told people here long time ago that Drawnik was like this. I
say lope the guy off and bring in Anand.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.