Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Except that List 512 is probably better than all of them!

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 17:22:40 10/22/04

Go up one level in this thread

Individual performances for List 512:

151 List 512        : 2516   36 (+ 22,=  7,-  7), 70.8 %

WARP 0.58           :   4 (+  2,=  2,-  0), 75.0 %
PostModernist 1010a :   4 (+  1,=  0,-  3), 25.0 %
SlowChess 2.93a     :   4 (+  2,=  2,-  0), 75.0 %
AnMon 5.32          :   4 (+  2,=  0,-  2), 50.0 %
Thinker 4.6c        :   4 (+  2,=  1,-  1), 62.5 %
Tao 5.7b04uci       :   3 (+  2,=  1,-  0), 83.3 %
Muse 0.898 uci      :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Gringo 1.4.0.21l    :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
nanoSzachy 1.2      :   1 (+  0,=  0,-  1),  0.0 %
Petir 1.0.4         :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Pseudo 0.6f         :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
E.T.Chess 020904    :   1 (+  0,=  1,-  0), 50.0 %
Kiwi 0.1c           :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Gaia 2.0            :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
J.S.BAM 0.32        :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
GES 1.21            :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
Gosu 0.3            :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
JanWillem 1.07      :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %
ATAK 4.1e           :   1 (+  1,=  0,-  0), 100.0 %

• Re: Except that List 512 is probably better than all of them! Leo Dijksman 01:09:41 10/23/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.