Author: Ingo Bauer
Date: 00:32:49 10/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hello >Personally I don't like the time control and I don't know if this version has >issues with the "inc" or not. As I allredy said: "Maybe it is the time controll" :-) , but 15 10 is a normal and often played time control. >ChessTiger 2004 gambit v Shredder 8 >+7 -6 =15 28 +7 =15 -6 51.7% TP = +12 Elo 68%->[-24,+78] 95%->[-62,+150] 99.7%->[-101,+236] That would give an advantage of 12 Elos for Tiger 2004 Gambit, maybe the normal Tiger is not the best one! >ChessTiger 2004 normal v Shredder 8 >+7 -14 =19 40 +7 =19 -14 41.2% TP = -61 Elo 68%->[-110,-25] 95%->[-163,+9] 99.7%->[-225,+44] -61 Elos, which would be in the range without the mentioned opening book failiures. In the mean time I made same more small test and I start to doubt that Tiger 2004 is really stronger than Tiger 15! Btw: If NOT using the original books I personaly do NOT like using different books then. Bye Ingo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.