Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 13:03:47 10/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2004 at 15:57:31, Dann Corbit wrote: >On October 24, 2004 at 15:40:43, Richard Pijl wrote: > >>On October 24, 2004 at 14:45:47, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On October 24, 2004 at 11:59:50, Theo van der Storm wrote: >>> >>>>http://www.computerschaak.nl/ >>>> >>>> p SB >>>>1. Diep 8,5 40.00 >>>>2. Nexus 8,5 39.75 >>>>3. Pro Deo 8.5 39.50 >>>> >>>>As announced before the tournament started >>>>Sonnenborg Berger points were used as a tie-breaker >>>>Opponents not played by all ending on top were removed from the SB count. >>>> >>>>Congratulations to all three teams. >>>>It was a pleasure having you and the other participants in this tournament. >>> >>>Was there a playoff to determine the standings? >> >>No. The standings were determined by the SB results against the common >>opponents. This to prevent that one program will always lose the SB tiebreak >>because it played a very weak opponent (we had a few of them in previous >>editions) which would ruin Buchholz (and SB scores). > >In the future, wouldn't TPR be a better tie-breaker than that? I think TPR has almost the same problem as Buchholz in this type of tournaments. The influence of pairings should be minimized as everybody plays almost everybody anyway. > >In any case all of the top 3 are certainly deserving of the win. We all agree on that. >Who wrote Nexus? Ralf Dörr and Norbert Esser from Germany. They also wrote a nice interface from which they control their engine. In the game of the Baron against Nexus I noticed that Nexus searched about 4 ply deeper than the Baron. It played quite solid chess. Richard. > >>> >>>Elostat output (reformatted): >>> >>> Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - Draws >>> >>> 1 Pro Deo : 8.5/ 11 77.3 2642 2854 204 222 27.3 % >>> 2 Nexus : 8.5/ 11 77.3 2635 2847 204 222 27.3 % >>> 3 Diep : 8.5/ 11 77.3 2630 2842 204 311 9.1 % >>> 4 Chess Tiger : 7.0/ 11 63.6 2649 2747 227 228 18.2 % >>> 5 The King : 7.0/ 11 63.6 2593 2690 227 172 36.4 % >>> 6 Tao : 6.5/ 11 59.1 2606 2670 237 192 27.3 % >>> 7 Deep Sjeng : 6.5/ 11 59.1 2618 2682 237 145 45.5 % >>> 8 The Baron : 6.0/ 11 54.5 2598 2629 247 210 18.2 % >>> 9 Ant : 6.0/ 11 54.5 2600 2631 247 164 36.4 % >>> 10 IsiChess MMX : 5.0/ 11 45.5 2587 2555 210 247 18.2 % >>> 11 GoldBar : 3.0/ 11 27.3 2583 2413 251 211 18.2 % >>> 12 Neurosis : 2.0/ 11 18.2 2613 2352 277 197 18.2 % >>> 13 Kallisto II : 1.5/ 11 13.6 2604 2284 359 190 9.1 % >>> 14 XiniX dubbel : 1.0/ 11 9.1 2602 2202 292 185 18.2 % >>> >>>pgn -X program output (reformatted) >>> >>> # Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121314 Score Buch Sommb >>>--- ------------ --------------------------- ------ ---- ----- >>> 1 Pro Deo * 0 1 1 = = = 1 1 1 1 1 8.5/11 64.5 46.00 >>> 2 Nexus 1 * 0 = 1 = 1 = 1 1 1 1 8.5/11 64.0 45.75 >>> 3 Diep 0 1 * 1 = 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 8.5/11 62.5 44.50 >>> 4 Chess Tiger 0 = 0 * 1 1 1 = 1 0 1 1 7.0/11 66.5 37.25 >>> 5 The King = 0 = 0 * = 1 = 1 1 1 1 7.0/11 57.5 27.75 >>> 6 Deep Sjeng = = 0 0 * = = = 1 1 1 1 6.5/11 61.5 28.25 >>> 7 Tao = 0 0 0 = = * 1 1 1 1 1 6.5/11 59.5 24.50 >>> 8 Ant 0 = 0 = 0 = * 1 1 1 1 = 6.0/11 58.5 23.00 >>> 9 The Baron 0 0 1 0 = 0 * 1 = 1 1 1 6.0/11 58.0 22.75 >>> 10 IsiChess MMX 0 0 1 = 0 0 0 * 1 1 1 = 5.0/11 57.0 17.50 >>> 11 GoldBar 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 * = 1 1 3.0/11 57.0 6.50 >>> 12 Neurosis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = * = 1 2.0/11 61.5 3.25 >>> 13 Kallisto II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = * 1 1.5/11 60.0 2.00 >>> 14 XiniX dubbel 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 = 0 0 0 * 1.0/11 59.0 5.50
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.