Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:11:29 10/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2004 at 12:33:07, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >On October 23, 2004 at 12:12:25, Dan Andersson wrote: > >> According to Ed it's not a Nommen book. I have fond memories of meeting 9. ... >>Bd7 Especially when I was up against a wunderkind. He was under the impression >>that he was good in a tactical skirmish and that I was a positional player :) >> >>MvH Dan Andersson > >I play this move 9. .. Bd7 myself - it seems ok. Sjeng played it horribly though >- 12. .. Qa5 is suspicious and then 15. .. Nc4 is just a blunder no human would >make - not even blindfold while casually browsing CCC :) ... Please suggest a better move than Nc4. (And note that Qa5 was book) Both engines agreed black is DEAD LOST after the opening. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.