Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:36:14 10/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2004 at 16:34:04, Uri Blass wrote: >I think that it is more fair then what was used. > >Diep did not play Isichess. > >Isichess is not a weak opponent. >It beated tiger and draw with the king. > >It is clear that Isichess had chances against Diep inspite of the fact that diep >was the favourite to win in case that they played. > >The result of ProDeo and Nexus are simply slightly better than the result of >Diep because of that reason. It's not Diep's fault that he didn't get to play Isichess, so how could it be fairer to punish him for that? -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.