Author: martin fierz
Date: 13:47:20 10/24/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2004 at 16:11:29, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 23, 2004 at 12:33:07, Vasik Rajlich wrote: > >>On October 23, 2004 at 12:12:25, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>> According to Ed it's not a Nommen book. I have fond memories of meeting 9. ... >>>Bd7 Especially when I was up against a wunderkind. He was under the impression >>>that he was good in a tactical skirmish and that I was a positional player :) >>> >>>MvH Dan Andersson >> >>I play this move 9. .. Bd7 myself - it seems ok. Sjeng played it horribly though >>- 12. .. Qa5 is suspicious and then 15. .. Nc4 is just a blunder no human would >>make - not even blindfold while casually browsing CCC :) ... > >Please suggest a better move than Nc4. (And note that Qa5 was book) > >Both engines agreed black is DEAD LOST after the opening. > >-- >GCP 9...Bd7 is not a particularly good choice in a not particularly sound opening. no surprise that black loses quickly. at least not to me. i don't know who makes your book, but i definitely wouldn't play the dragon as black if i were the book author! cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.