Author: KarinsDad
Date: 15:07:52 01/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 13, 1999 at 17:48:18, John Coffey wrote: > >The trouble with control of squares is that you have to take into account >the values of the pieces that attack a square. i.e. a pawn could control >a square. I had figured out that I could use bits for each type of piece >that attacked a square, where pawns use high bits and kings use low bits. >Add the bits for each side and the side with the highest number (more or less) >controls the square. Thanks John, I was toying with doing something in the back of my head about control of squares, but it was low priority. I had gotten as far as determining that the side with the least valuable resources controlling the square was in fact actually controlling it, but didn't have the time to really think about it. This saves me a lot of thought. KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.