Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 23:48:38 10/25/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2004 at 09:41:58, Daniel Jackson wrote: >On October 21, 2004 at 00:52:21, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: > >>Lets stop this Daniel once and for all, it was u who first replied to my post in >>that manner. I dont mind critising my views, everyone has that right (everyone >>has different way of thinking)but atleast there should not be personal attacks. >> >>I was not against Kasparov,Kramnik at all. I consider both to be World class >>playrs. My earlier posts were sheerly out of anger that no other player (rather >>than these 4)has a fair chance at the title and it did not mean anything against >>the three K's. I know if different system like a all play all qualifiers if >>adopted by FIDE, Kasparov and Kramnik will be there in the semis on Merit but >>the other 2 players might be different. Dont u think we require 4 best players >>in the world playing at semifinal and final in World Championship to make it >>relly worth something, No doubt Kasparov, Kramnik has greater chance of winning. >> >>My comment that Leko-Kramnik was fixed was sheerly out of anger and I apologise >>to everyone (and to the great players also even though I am nowhere near them to >>post something like that)here for having made such comment and I should have >>thought long before posting something like that. >> >>That does not mean our debate will stop only thing that I will not write >>anything abusive to u no matter how u write. This post is not writtern out of >>any anger. >> >>Regards >> >>Vikrant > >I have no intention debating you whatsoever. Pointless. It was u who replied to my first post in a rude manner. U seem to have a very short memory. U were not good in that post at all and I decided to give tit for tat. U r no good and find only faults in others when u have plenty.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.