Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 12:03:29 10/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2004 at 14:48:01, Graham Banks wrote:
>On October 26, 2004 at 14:41:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On October 26, 2004 at 14:21:43, odell jones wrote:
>>
>>>Just wondering has there been any extensive test to show that chessmaster is
>>>significantly stronger then the previous version.
>>
>> There is such a test: please have a look at
>> http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm
>> Kurt
>
>
>This is great work Kurt. However I still believe that the best CM10th settings
>(whatever they turn out to be) will still outperform the best CM9000 settings
>due to the fact that CM10th Default is stronger than CM9000 Default.
>There's a lot of testing still to be done!
>Graham.
Hi Graham
I fully agree with you. It should be possible to create
CM10-settings that are stronger than the best CM9-settings.
But this time it's not me or my chessfriend Rolf Bühler to
find out as we have stopped testing/playing with CM10th
for a while: too tired with all the work and engine author
Johan de Koning does anyway not seem to have much interest
in such tests.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.