Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 18:00:11 10/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2004 at 18:54:42, Michel Langeveld wrote: >Incase someone else is also interested hereby two benchmarks done with the AMD >Athlon 64 3400+ and the AMD Athlon 64 3500+. I found the Athlon 64 3400+ on the >internet and let the Athlon 64 3500+ do by someone who was very helpfull on ICC. > >The 3400+ has 2.4Ghz - 1 memory controller - L1 128KB - L2 512KB - socket 754 >The 3500+ has 2.2Ghz - 1 memory controllers - L1 128KB - L2 512KB - socket 939 > >I was not sure which was the fastest .... >For chess the result is that the +3400 is around 4.9% faster as the +3500. > >AMD Athlon 3400+ 2.4Ghz - no crafty rc >====================================== >Crafty v19.17 >Total nodes: 90925937 >Raw nodes per second: 1567688 >Total elapsed time: 58 > >AMD Athlon 3500+ 2.2Ghz - no crafty rc >====================================== >Crafty 19.17 >Total nodes: 90925937 >Raw nodes per second: 1490589 >Total elapsed time: 61 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.491803 > >Request >======= >Does someone else has an Athlon 64 / Opteron? I am very interested in the >benchmarks results of crafty without hash. The we can compare what is the >influence of the socket / cache / etc. > >You can find an executable here: > >http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/download/crafty/crafty_1917_DC.zip Question -- is the exe without futility enabled here? Otherwise , total nodes searched is not correct I believe for 19.17 with futility enabled.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.