Author: Michel Langeveld
Date: 04:02:16 10/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2004 at 21:00:11, Mike Byrne wrote: >On October 26, 2004 at 18:54:42, Michel Langeveld wrote: > >>Incase someone else is also interested hereby two benchmarks done with the AMD >>Athlon 64 3400+ and the AMD Athlon 64 3500+. I found the Athlon 64 3400+ on the >>internet and let the Athlon 64 3500+ do by someone who was very helpfull on ICC. >> >>The 3400+ has 2.4Ghz - 1 memory controller - L1 128KB - L2 512KB - socket 754 >>The 3500+ has 2.2Ghz - 1 memory controllers - L1 128KB - L2 512KB - socket 939 >> >>I was not sure which was the fastest .... >>For chess the result is that the +3400 is around 4.9% faster as the +3500. >> >>AMD Athlon 3400+ 2.4Ghz - no crafty rc >>====================================== >>Crafty v19.17 >>Total nodes: 90925937 >>Raw nodes per second: 1567688 >>Total elapsed time: 58 >> >>AMD Athlon 3500+ 2.2Ghz - no crafty rc >>====================================== >>Crafty 19.17 >>Total nodes: 90925937 >>Raw nodes per second: 1490589 >>Total elapsed time: 61 >>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 10.491803 >> >>Request >>======= >>Does someone else has an Athlon 64 / Opteron? I am very interested in the >>benchmarks results of crafty without hash. The we can compare what is the >>influence of the socket / cache / etc. >> >>You can find an executable here: >> >>http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/download/crafty/crafty_1917_DC.zip > >Question -- is the exe without futility enabled here? Otherwise , total nodes >searched is not correct I believe for 19.17 with futility enabled. I think the executable is a default compile by Dann Corbit
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.