Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:39:22 10/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2004 at 07:45:35, Daniel Shawul wrote: >On October 27, 2004 at 03:49:38, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >> >> >>Rank Engine Score Ba Da S-B >>1 DanChess 10.5/15 · ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· 11=11=100101=11 42.75 >>2 Baron 1.5.0 4.5/15 00=00=011010=00 · ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· 42.75 >> >> >>15 of 20 games played >>Tournament start: 2004.10.24, 22:52:30 >>Latest update: 2004.10.27, 07:13:03 >>Site/ Country: S0025128408, United States >>Level: Blitz 20/1 >>Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz >>Operating system: Microsoft Windows 2000 Build 2195 >>PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn >>Table created with: Arena 1.092 >Hi Jorge >thanks for the games. >I don't think DanChess is as strong as the result implies. >May be it is better than Baron in blitz. DanChess itself is weak in blitz. >I am sure the difference will vanish at longer time control. >best >daniel I do not understand. If Danchess is weak in blitz then how can it get good results in blitz and not at longer time control? Maybe you mean that Baron is weak in blitz or that Danchess is relatively weaker at longer time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.