Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:09:48 10/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2004 at 09:01:08, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On October 27, 2004 at 08:47:28, Günther Simon wrote:
>
>>I would like to see the games, because I smell a flaw again...
>>
>>Guenther
>
>This is the same Baron with the same settings that beat Muse 0899b in my
>previous match :-)
>
>
>Rank Engine Score Ba Da S-B
>1 Dan 14.0/20 ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· 11=11=100101=11=1101 84.00
>2 Baron 1.5.0 6.0/20 00=00=011010=00=0010 · ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· 84.00
>
>
>20 games played / Tournament finished
>Tournament start: 2004.10.24, 22:52:30
>Latest update: 2004.10.27, 10:58:22
>Site/ Country: S0025128408, United States
>Level: Blitz 20/1
>Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz
>Operating system: Microsoft Windows 2000 Build 2195
>PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn
>Table created with: Arena 1.092
>
>
>[Event "Arena tournament"]
>[Site "S0025128408"]
>[Date "2004.10.26"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Baron 1.5.0"]
>[Black "Dan"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "E15"]
>[Opening "Queen's Indian"]
>[Time "22:37:06"]
>[Variation "Nimzowitsch, 5.Nbd2"]
>[TimeControl "1200+1"]
>[Termination "normal"]
>[PlyCount "182"]
>[WhiteType "program"]
>[BlackType "program"]
>
>1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Ba6 5.Nbd2 d5 6.Bg2 Be7 7.Ne5 O-O {+0.15/11 53}
>8.O-O Bb7 9.b3 a5 10.Bb2 Na6 11.cxd5 exd5 {0.00/11 51} 12.Rc1 Nd7 {+0.22/11 48}
>13.Qc2 Nxe5 {+0.47/11 25} 14.dxe5 Qd7 {+0.52/10 24} 15.e3 {-0.09/5 91} c5
>{+0.59/10
>24} 16.a3 {-0.05/9 29} a4 {+0.64/10 23} 17.bxa4 {+0.02/9 29} Bc6 {+0.60/10 24}
>18.a5 {-0.06/9 28} bxa5 {+0.54/8 25} 19.Nb3 {-0.06/5 21} Rfb8 {+0.31/9 21}
>20.Nxa5
>{+0.40/5 41}
Baron got only depth 5 in 41 seconds and it is not the only case(it happened
also at move 19 with 21 seconds).
I think that maybe it is better if programmers tell their program to refuse to
play if they do not get enough nodes per second when the user may choose the
minimal number of nodes per second based on the speed of his computer.
I think to make minimal number of nodes per second as a parameter and probably
suggest to set it as 1/2 of the number of nodes per second that the program get
in the opening position.
In case that the program does not get enough nodes per second it will refuse to
play and report game aborted by insufficient number of nodes.
What is your opinion?
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.