Author: Albert Silver
Date: 17:24:50 10/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
>List 5.12, a proven beast in slow time controls among the free engines, beat Pro
>Deo 24.5 - 15.5. I have only tested once before against it and "improved" that
>to a -5 score (17.5 - 22.5), so I didn't bother posting here. I am about
>finished testing a new group of settings, and only wonder whether the result
>might not be some kind of fluke. You see it didn't equalize, it is beating List
>22.5 - 16.5 (+6) with one game to go, and which I cannot run just now.
It won the last game impressively too, so the score ended 23.5 - 16.5 or (+7).
The final position is worthy of a diagram:
[D]r1rn4/5Rbk/1p1p2pp/1N1Pp2R/pPP4q/P3B3/2Q1B1PP/6K1 b - - 0 43
And here's the game for good measure:
[Event "Nunn2-PDSD67Always-List512-30"]
[Site "Private"]
[Date "2004.10.27"]
[Round "40.1"]
[White "Pro Deo 1.0"]
[Black "List 512"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E92"]
[WhiteElo "2700"]
[BlackElo "2700"]
[PlyCount "85"]
[EventDate "2004.10.25"]
[Source "Silver"]
1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 g6 3. c4 Bg7 4. Nc3 O-O 5. e4 d6 6. Be2 e5 7. d5 a5 8. Bg5 h6
9. Bh4 Na6 10. Nd2 Qe8 11. O-O Nh7 12. a3 Bd7 13. f3 {
[%eval 27,13] [%emt 0:01:29]} Ng5 {(f5) [%eval 4,14] [%emt 0:01:16]} 14. Bf2 {
[%eval 39,13] [%emt 0:01:23]} Qe7 {[%eval 8,14] [%emt 0:01:14]} 15. Qc2 {
(Bd3) [%eval 33,12] [%emt 0:01:13]} Qf6 {(f5) [%eval 4,13] [%emt 0:01:11]} 16.
Be3 {(Nb5) [%eval 44,11] [%emt 0:01:14]} Qe7 {[%eval 8,13] [%emt 0:01:20]} 17.
Rae1 {(Rfd1) [%eval 42,12] [%emt 0:01:13]} Rfc8 {
(Nc5) [%eval 3,12] [%emt 0:00:51]} 18. Rc1 {(b3) [%eval 42,13] [%emt 0:01:19]}
b6 {(Nc5) [%eval 8,13] [%emt 0:01:07]} 19. Nb5 {
(b3) [%eval 42,13] [%emt 0:01:06]} Qf6 {(Nh7) [%eval 11,12] [%emt 0:01:01]} 20.
Rb1 {(b3) [%eval 53,12] [%emt 0:01:04]} Nc5 {(c6) [%eval 10,12] [%emt 0:00:42]}
21. b4 {(b3) [%eval 61,13] [%emt 0:01:09]} Nb7 {
(axb4) [%eval 14,13] [%emt 0:00:58]} 22. Rfc1 {
(Ra1) [%eval 67,11] [%emt 0:00:33]} Bf8 {(Qe7) [%eval 14,11] [%emt 0:00:49]}
23. Nb3 {(Qc3) [%eval 71,11] [%emt 0:00:57]} Bg7 {[%eval 19,11] [%emt 0:00:39]}
24. Qd1 {(Qd2) [%eval 76,12] [%emt 0:01:18]} a4 {[%eval 52,11] [%emt 0:00:54]}
25. Nd2 {[%eval 77,13] [%emt 0:00:28]} Qe7 {[%eval 64,12] [%emt 0:00:48]} 26.
Bd3 {[%eval 81,13] [%emt 0:00:51]} Qe8 {[%eval 80,12] [%emt 0:00:42]} 27. Rb2 {
[%eval 90,12] [%emt 0:00:31]} f5 {[%eval 88,12] [%emt 0:00:42]} 28. Nb1 {
[%eval 95,12] [%emt 0:00:31]} fxe4 {(Bf6) [%eval 103,12] [%emt 0:01:01]} 29.
fxe4 {[%eval 100,12] [%emt 0:00:18]} Nh7 {[%eval 109,13] [%emt 0:00:44]} 30.
N1c3 {[%eval 83,13] [%emt 0:00:43]} Nf6 {[%eval 104,13] [%emt 0:00:36]} 31. Be2
{(h3) [%eval 87,12] [%emt 0:00:29]} Qe7 {(Kh8) [%eval 90,11] [%emt 0:00:33]}
32. Rd2 {(h3) [%eval 96,12] [%emt 0:00:42]} Qf8 {
(Qf7) [%eval 98,11] [%emt 0:00:38]} 33. Qc2 {[%eval 135,13] [%emt 0:00:28]} Qd8
{(Qe7) [%eval 98,12] [%emt 0:00:29]} 34. Rf1 {[%eval 134,13] [%emt 0:00:41]}
Kh8 {(Qe7) [%eval 107,12] [%emt 0:00:43]} 35. Bd1 {
[%eval 164,13] [%emt 0:00:38]} Kh7 {(Bg4) [%eval 125,12] [%emt 0:00:43]} 36.
Rdf2 {(Nxa4) [%eval 176,13] [%emt 0:00:31]} c5 {
(Bg4) [%eval 119,13] [%emt 0:00:44]} 37. dxc6 {
(Qd3) [%eval 228,13] [%emt 0:00:32]} Rxc6 {(Bxc6) [%eval 153,13] [%emt 0:00:40]
} 38. Nd5 {(Qd3) [%eval 436,12] [%emt 0:00:25]} Nxd5 {
[%eval 356,13] [%emt 0:00:47]} 39. exd5 {[%eval 416,11] [%emt 0:00:05]} Rcc8 {
[%eval 560,13] [%emt 0:00:47]} 40. Rf7 {[%eval 596,12] [%emt 0:00:30]} Bf5 {
[%eval 666,13] [%emt 0:00:47]} 41. R1xf5 {[%eval 687,12] [%emt 0:00:26]} Qh4 {
[%eval 738,13] [%emt 0:00:24]} 42. Be2 {[%eval 736,11] [%emt 0:00:21]} Nd8 {
[%eval 764,13] [%emt 0:00:21]} 43. Rh5 {[%eval 810,11] [%emt 0:00:25]} 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.