Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:11:55 10/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2004 at 09:56:42, Drexel,Michael wrote:
>On October 31, 2004 at 08:45:32, robert flesher wrote:
>
>First of all it is not his job to look out for book losses.
>The book is part of the package.
>
>Blaming the book is most often a lame excuse.
>
>If you play 5.Bh3 in this position:
>
>[D] r1bqkbnr/1p2pppp/p1np4/2p5/4P3/2NP2P1/PPP2P1P/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 5
>
>you simply deserve the loss.
>
>This was certainly not a book move.
>My Tiger 15 also prefers to play this Nonsense.
>
>Above all people should scale down their expectations a bit.
>Even a 30 ELO improvement today is hard to achieve >2700 SSDF.
>
>Michael
Hi Michael
It was a surprise to see 5.Bh3 but even CT_15
does not consider other moves as being stronger.
Kurt
New game,
r1bqkbnr/1p2pppp/p1np4/2p5/4P3/2NP2P1/PPP2P1P/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
Analysis by Chess Tiger 15.0: (P4 1.8/32 MB hash)
5.Bh3 Nf6 6.a3 e5 7.f4 Nd4 8.Bxc8 Qxc8 9.h3 h6 10.Nf3 Nh5 11.Nxd4
= (-0.04) Depth: 11 00:00:12 3001kN
= (-0.06) Depth: 17 00:17:43 285014kN
(Utzinger, MyTown 31.10.2004)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.