Author: Albert Silver
Date: 05:58:38 11/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2004 at 06:13:10, Mark R. Anderson wrote:
>Peter,
>
>Yes, Hiarcs is known to be a good at blitz, but what's worse for Tiger here is
>that Tiger was playing with a hardware speed advantage and still lost badly.
Err, you mean the opposite no doubt. Hiarcs had the hardware advantage.
>>Hiarcs 9 used a PIV 2.0Ghz 128M hash tables.
>>Chess Tiger was on an Athlon 1800+ 96M hash tables.
Albert
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.