Author: Sedat
Date: 07:37:22 11/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2004 at 08:58:38, Albert Silver wrote: >On November 01, 2004 at 06:13:10, Mark R. Anderson wrote: > >>Peter, >> >>Yes, Hiarcs is known to be a good at blitz, but what's worse for Tiger here is >>that Tiger was playing with a hardware speed advantage and still lost badly. > >Err, you mean the opposite no doubt. Hiarcs had the hardware advantage. > >>>Hiarcs 9 used a PIV 2.0Ghz 128M hash tables. >>>Chess Tiger was on an Athlon 1800+ 96M hash tables. > > Albert No comments !! AMD Athlon XP 1800+ 1524MHz (00:00:51.4 sec.) [1791780 pps.] PowX= 5.582 Pentium 4 CPU 2.00GHz (00:00:55.7 sec.) [1653456 pps.] PowX= 5.151 For full Axon Benchmark list please clich here: http://www.geocities.com/sedatchess/hardwere.html
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.