Author: Ernest Bonnem
Date: 15:17:31 11/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 01, 2004 at 08:58:38, Albert Silver wrote: >On November 01, 2004 at 06:13:10, Mark R. Anderson wrote: > >>Peter, >> >>Yes, Hiarcs is known to be a good at blitz, but what's worse for Tiger here is >>that Tiger was playing with a hardware speed advantage and still lost badly. > >Err, you mean the opposite no doubt. Hiarcs had the hardware advantage. > >>>Hiarcs 9 used a PIV 2.0Ghz 128M hash tables. >>>Chess Tiger was on an Athlon 1800+ 96M hash tables. > > Albert Athlon 1800+ is 1533MHz. For chess, experience shows (it may vary a little with the chess program) that a PIV is comparable to Athlon if you multiply its frequency by 2/3 or at most by 0.7. So, if you use the latter, the 2.0GHz PIV is equivalent to a 1400MHz Athlon.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.