Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:30:49 01/14/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 14, 1999 at 21:10:37, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On January 14, 1999 at 20:21:43, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>On January 14, 1999 at 20:15:07, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >> (SNIPS) >>>I think that summary deletion of posts that attempt to discuss moderation issues >>>is extremely threatening. >>> >>>bruce >> >>As I agree with your statement above, I'd like to find out which posts, by which >>posters were deleted. You only refer to a member and a post. Could you please >>be more specific. >> >>Regards, >>Djordje > > >Maybe the moderator could explain why the posts were deleted, I think this may >have been moderated to the extreme. This should not be happening. > >Bad, Bad Moderators :-) Just my $.02, but I think we need two things. When a post is deleted, *something* needs to be put in its place, so that at least others can notice that a post was removed. Even better, a short note in the 'replacement post' would be even better. deleting things helter-skelter isn't going to cut it, IMHO. I am not going to waste a lot of time trying to answer technical questions here, and then have to continually go back and check on them to see if something was deleted because I wasn't quite polite enough. IE an audit trail is needed. Because the moderators work for 'us', just as when I was a moderator I worked for 'you'... and it will avoid a lot of suspicion and distrust if everyone 'knows' what is going on (or not going on).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.