Author: Bryan Hofmann
Date: 14:50:19 11/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2004 at 01:41:17, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>On November 03, 2004 at 18:39:48, Bryan Hofmann wrote:
>
>>On November 03, 2004 at 07:07:27, Dom Leste wrote:
>>
>>>This time Pro Deo S&D5.7 against List 512
>>>
>>>Here it played 24.Rc3, but did it miss the line Nxf7, Any takers :)
>>>
>>>[D]r1bqr1k1/4np1p/pp2p1p1/3n2N1/3PN3/PB6/1P1Q1PPP/2R1R1K1 w - - 0 1
>>>
>>>
>>>Pro Deo S&D5.7 went on to win
>>>
>>>24...Kg7 25.Rf3 f5 26.Nc3 Qd6 27.Bxd5 Nxd5 28.Nxd5 Qxd5 29.Rh3 h5 30.Nf3 Bb7
>>>31.Rg3
>>>Ref8 32.Ne5 Rf6 33.Rc1 Rc8 34.Rxc8 Bxc8 {Black resigns} 1-0
>>>
>>>
>>>Dom
>
> There seems to be a big difference between Tao 5.7 Beta 6
> and Tao 5.6
> Kurt
>
>Tao 5.7 Beta 6
>9/36+ 00:07 4.217.222 561.828 +0.82 Nxf7
>
>
>Tao 5.6
>12/30+ 05:27 117.465.037 359.116 +0.92 Sxf7
>12/30 05:35 120.688.966 359.312 +1.42 Sxf7 Kxf7 Dh6 Th8 Sg5+ Ke8 Dg7 Tf8 Lxd5
Yes there are several differences and improvements over the 5.6 version and even
the released 5.7 Beta 3. The score above was using very experimental settings in
which Tactical Positions such as this Tao does extremely well with but playing
the whole game is another matter. It will take some time to tune things for an
even balance.
Bryan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.