Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 03:14:17 11/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 04, 2004 at 22:23:56, Andrew Walker wrote: >On November 04, 2004 at 14:23:09, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On November 04, 2004 at 13:41:03, Sandro Necchi wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >>>I was not complaining, but only making things more clear. >> >>Yes, why not so we have a nice disucss and the others can read it too. >> >>>I am making huge pressure on SMK to make higher improvements...unfortunately I >>>am never enough satisfied... >> >>That is professional thinking of course! >> >>>This is true, but an improvemnt of less than 50 points is not easy to see... >> >>Yes, for me only with a lot of games :-( >> >>>Yes, I think Shredder is one of the most important programs of CB. >> >>Shredder is the most important program we have today. >>Simple: Shredder is the number one! >> >>>I do not like to speak about other chess programs to avoid missunderstandings, >>>but I have a lot of respect of the Gandalf team. >>>I believe the program is clearly stronger, so the customers should be happy with >>>it. >>>I have not seen it yet, so mine is just an impression based on what I am >>>expecting. >> >>Here you must understand my position! >> >>The positions I have in the latest five-six years from the work I do: >> >>- Group building for make more! >>- Animation for get more! >>- Compatibility for get more! >>- Support for get more! >> >>For get more: >>If I try this I have the result to have more in the future for my own interest. >>So you can see that I am thinking on myself with the work I made too. >> >>I wrote Gandalf and Shredder: >>Booth programs are important: >> >>- Shredder supported a standard protocol (UCI), is the strongest program we >>have, good endgame, nice openings, good positional computer chess. >> >>- Gandalf supported a standard protocol (UCI and WB), have the most interesting >>middelgame, played the most shortest games vs. other top programs and we have >>fire on the board. >> >>And now Sandro: >>A user asked ... what is a good combination for my fast PC to analyze games. >>The right answer is Shredder in combination with Gandalf and all the strong >>amateurs we have because each amateur have a selection it's very good. Example >>Yace in endgame. >> >>Booth programs are interesting for users because users can used booth program >>under all available GUIs. For me is absolutely clear, my commercial favorits >>from the "older" available commercial engines. Like Hiarcs too but the program >>is for me not interesting because the engine support is bad. >> > >What do you mean by this? The last few releases have been about 1 year apart, >and according to the author a new one is very possible by the end of the year. > >Andrew Hi Andrew, what did you mean exactly? Have understanding problems. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.