Author: Lex Loep
Date: 08:30:39 11/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Frank, > >Hi Lex, > >I wonder! >Are all the engines compatible to ChessPartner GUI? >Autoplayer games, I know :-) I am sure you know the answer :) As you know ChessPartner has good support for winboard/uci/uci2 engines. > >Do you have more resutls vs. engines which supported the standard protocols WB >and UCI, much more important for the most readers. Think so because the most >tourneys you find in WWW are tourneys with WB / UCI engines so I must thinking >that the most users have other interest. > >Would like to see resutls vs. >Aristarch, List, ProDeo, Sjeng, SOS ... the TOP 10 from the WB / UCI engines as >results vs. only this four programs ... from all which are available ... which >don't support the standard engine protcols (Fritz, Junior, Hiarcs and Tiger). We got many more results but there are all from older betas. Its not very usefull to post the games. Because you asked it here some results: Gandalf 6 beta 18 - Ruffian 2.1.0 +9 -8 =14 Gandalf 6 Beta 18 - Patriot 1.2.3 result: 15 : 5 Gandalf 6 beta 17 - Deep Sjeng 1.6 +21 -7 =12 Gandalf 6 beta 17 - Crafty 19.17 +13 -3 =4 (Crafty used "general.ctg") Gandalf 6 beta 16 - Aristarch 4.50 +18 -14 =18 Gandalf 6 Beta 16 - List 5.12 +13 -3 =4 Gandalf 6 beta 15 - Prodeo 1.0 +23 -11 =11 Well you get the picture. > >Easy why I wrote this: >Gandalf 6 supported the two main protocls WB and UCI and this is the reason that >it would be great to have results vs. Engines which have also such a good engine >support. > >Why I wrote this: >I can not many things say to the results vs. Fritz, Hiarcs and Junior because >it's simple ... the programs have a bad engine protocol support and I can only >test under a GUI (Fritz GUI) which have a bad WB support (houndrets of other >engines don't work 1:1). > >You can say ... >But Frank, thinking on SSDF and thinking how strong are the engines Fritz, >Junior, Hiarcs and Tiger. You will find a lot of friends of commercial software >with such words I am sure but if this persons which give such comments are >honest this group of persons will give a comment ... > >Yes Frank you have right! >Much more interesting is Fritz, Junior, Tiger and Hiarcs if I can run this >engines under ChessPartner :-), ChessAssistant, ChessAcademy, ShredderClassic, >WinBoard and and yes ... Arena! > >Only the "commercial user supportler" gave in the past such bad comments. But >the "commercial user supportler" are thinking all in a still minute ... > >I cann't write it in a forum or the companys don't send me the software for free >or for a good price but Frank have right. I have much more possibilitys if >Fritz, Hiarcs, Tiger and Junior supported the UCI or WB procotol. > >COMPATIBILITY, the topic I like ... now six years :-) >And perhaps the day is comming the companys are thinking about users and here >wishes! > I have no problem with compatability. Lex >Best >Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.